“California Governor Gavin Newsom says America needs a tax system that asks more of its wealthiest citizens. But at the same time, he argues a billionaire tax limited to California would do more harm than good.”
California Governor Gavin Newsom has unveiled a proposal for a national billionaire tax, calling it the first step toward an “economic reset” to tackle widening wealth inequality in the United States.
The proposal came just a day after California officials confirmed that a ballot measure seeking to impose a one-time 5% tax on billionaires in the state had qualified for the November election. While Newsom supports taxing the ultra-wealthy at the federal level, he continues to oppose the California initiative, arguing it could encourage wealthy residents to leave the state and weaken its long-term tax base.
In a post outlining his plan, Newsom wrote:
“It’s time for an economic reset.”
His proposal would introduce a federal minimum tax on individuals worth more than $100 million, close loopholes that allow billionaires to borrow against rising stock values without paying taxes, restore higher corporate tax rates, and reform inheritance laws to reduce the concentration of wealth across generations.
Newsom also floated a new idea linked to artificial intelligence.
SEE ALSO: Trump threatens 100% tariffs on countries that tax US tech companies, escalating trade pressure
He suggested creating a national public equity fund that would allow Americans to collectively own a stake in major AI companies, arguing that the economic gains from artificial intelligence should not be enjoyed only by a handful of technology firms.
“Every American should own a piece of the future,” Newsom said, referring to the AI-driven economy.
The timing of the announcement has drawn attention because it contrasts sharply with his position back home.
The California ballot measure would apply a one-time 5% tax on residents with more than $1 billion in wealth, with supporters saying it could raise about $100 billion to help fund healthcare, education, and food assistance. Newsom has repeatedly argued that while he supports asking the wealthy to pay more, a state-only wealth tax is the wrong approach because it could push billionaires and businesses to relocate.
That position has drawn criticism from some Democrats.
Representative Ro Khanna and other progressives have accused Newsom of siding with Silicon Valley billionaires in opposing the California proposal while embracing a similar idea nationally. Newsom counters that wealth taxes are more effective when applied across the country rather than by a single state competing with others for investment.
The proposal is also fueling speculation about Newsom’s national ambitions. Although he has not announced plans to run for president in 2028, the sweeping economic agenda marks one of his clearest attempts yet to shape the Democratic Party’s debate on taxes, wealth, and artificial intelligence.
Whether Congress would seriously consider such a plan is another matter. With Republicans controlling key parts of Washington, the chances of a federal billionaire tax becoming law remain slim.
Still, Newsom’s message is clear: he believes the country’s wealthiest Americans should pay more, but he wants that conversation to happen in Washington, not just in California.
