Entertainment

Peter Okoye Admits Retaining $800,000 in PSquare Royalties From Brother Jude in Court Testimony

Peter Okoye Admits Retaining $800,000 in PSquare Royalties From Brother Jude in Court Testimony

Singer Peter Okoye, popularly known as Mr P, has admitted before a Federal High Court in Lagos that he received over $800,000 in music royalties from the French rights management body SACEM without sharing the proceeds with his elder brother, Jude Okoye.

The revelation came during virtual cross-examination by defense counsel Clement Onwuewunor (SAN). While acknowledging the receipt of the funds, Peter clarified that the money was intended solely for the performing artists of the group, himself and his twin brother, Paul Okoye (Rudeboy).

Central to Peter’s testimony was the assertion that Jude, despite his close familial ties and historical involvement in the group’s visual aesthetics, was never an official member of PSquare. Peter argued that Jude had no direct employment contract with the group. While he conceded that Jude directed several of PSquare’s iconic music videos, he maintained that all of the group’s songs were composed and produced strictly by himself and Paul.

The testimony is a critical component of an ongoing, high-profile legal battle. Jude Okoye and his firm, Northside Music Limited, are currently facing a seven-count charge involving N1.3 billion and $1 million in alleged fraud, brought by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). Jude has consistently pleaded not guilty to all charges.

SEE ALSO: Peter Okoye fires back at Jude, makes fresh Northside Music allegations

During the proceedings, Peter also confirmed that he had received PSquare royalty reports covering the period from 2016 to 2022 from Jude. These exchanges occurred following requests linked to potential buyers interested in acquiring the group’s lucrative music catalogue.

Presiding Judge Alexander Owoeye has adjourned the case until December 8 and 9, 2026, for the continuation of the trial.

As the legal proceedings unfold, the case serves as a stark, public dissection of the fragile dynamics that can unravel even the most successful family enterprises in the entertainment industry. Beyond the staggering financial figures, the trial highlights the enduring challenge of defining creative contribution versus familial support in the high-stakes world of intellectual property.

Filed under: Entertainment